ROYAL CARE FOR THE POOR IN ISRAEL’S FIRST HISTORY: THE ROYAL LAW DEUTERONOMIAN 17:14-20), HANNAH’S SONG (1 SAMUEL 2:1-10), SAMUEL’S WARNING (1 SAMUEL 8:10-18), DAVID’S ATTITUDE (2 SAMUEL 24:10-24) AND AHAB AND NABOTH (1 KINGS 21) IN INTERTEXT
It has been widely recognised in scholarship that the Deuteronomistic History (Deuteronomy to 2 Kings 25) was written to explain why the states of Israel and Judah both failed, attributing the reasons for the failure to their kings’ disobedience regarding the demand of cult centralisation (Dt. 12) and keeping idolatry at bay (Dt. 13). This article argues that material questions (e.g. land and economic existence) are integral to the history and that the monarchy’s failure to care properly for the poor can be added as a further reason for the demise of Israel (north and south). As such the history not merely narrates the political history of (early) Israel, but also conveys a socio-ethical message.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
ISSN 2305-445X (online); ISSN 0254-1807 (print)
|Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2013.|
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.