Deane-Peter Baker


This paper offers an analysis of Nicholas Wolterstorff’s contribution to the
Reformed epistemology movement, which holds as its central claim the idea that
belief in God can, under the appropriate circumstances, be properly basic. In
particular this paper addresses Wolterstoff’s arguments for his claim that Christian
believers are epistemically entitled to their beliefs. The paper begins by setting out
Wolterstoff’s theory, before articulating the main lines of objection that have been
raised against Wolterstorff’s arguments. The paper concludes with an analysis of
whether or not Wolterstorff’s arguments offer genuine support to the Reformed
epistemology project.


Reformed Epistemology, The De Jure Objection to Religious Belief, Religious Experience, Epistemic Entitlement, Epistemic Warrant

Full Text:


DOI: https://doi.org/10.7833/102-0-609


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN 2305-445X (online); ISSN 0254-1807 (print)

Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2013.


This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help