INVITING A DIALOGUE ON ‘DIALOGUE’…

  • H L Fouché University of the Western Cape
  • Dirk J Smit University of the Western Cape
Keywords: Dialogue, Gadamer, Derrida, Rorty, Haberman

Abstract

The concept of ‘dialogue’ can have radically different meanings to different people (Cf Müller 1991; Doeser 1983; Handgraaf 1983; Vroom 1983; Tracy 1981, 1987, 1989).  But it can also serve as an umbrella-description for major questions.  In this article the ambiguity of ‘dialogue’ is traced with reference to four well-known positions on dialogue: Gadamer (Trusting dialogue in goodwill …), Derrida (Suspicious dialogue in counter-position …), Rorty (Dialogue as therapy that changes our vocabulary …), and Haberman (Non-coercive dialogue according to rational procedures …).  Some tentative conclusions on different approaches to dialogue are drawn and reflections on the relevance for scholars and for South African (theological; religious; political; scholarly; ethical, etc) discourse are presented.

Author Biographies

H L Fouché, University of the Western Cape
University of the Western Cape
Dirk J Smit, University of the Western Cape
University of the Western Cape
Published
2019-09-10
Section
Articles