EVOLUTIONARY HERMENEUTICS: DOGMATIC IMPOSITION OR BIBLICAL DISCERNMENT? A REJOINDER

• Klaus Nürnberger School of Theology University of Kwa-Zulu Natal

DOI : https://doi.org/10.7833/90-0-1083

Résumé

This essay responds to five reviews of my Theology of the Biblical Witness. While the project was generally appreciated, there was a general feeling that I imposed a pre-formulated grid on the wealth of the biblical detail. In my response, I argue that, to reduce unmanageable complexities, research cannot do without models. While deductive models are impositions of systems of inferences from ostensibly selfevident assumptions, inductive models are obtained from prioritisation of aspects of experienced reality. Moreover, in their verdict of linearity, reductionism and grid imposition, the reviewers have applied their preconceived concepts of evolution rather than taking heed of the model that I have actually utilised. Here evolution is seen in the context of the cosmic entropic process and take levels of emergence into account that covers the whole of reality. To evaluate the model, the actual procedures and findings of my research must be checked against the biblical material. I claim that my method is more capable of integrating biblical research and theological reflection than conventional approaches.